I interrupt this homework-filled weekend to bring you these brief messages.

December 9, 2007 at 1:05 pm 2 comments

Work on LOUD.ROBOT is going well. I have a new review up and the first of what I hope to be many submissions. The project has really grown on me, and I want to keep it up even after my grades are submitted. I am a little frustrated with my partner on the project, who has contributed content but still hasn’t sent the final artwork I expected about three weeks ago. At this point, I don’t even really feel like changing what I put up for the time being with whatever he’s working on, but it’s his project too, I guess.

In political news, Mike Huckabee boils my blood. In addition to reading about his plan in 1992 to quarantine AIDS patients and votes against AIDS research, Huckabee’s justifications for excluding gays from marriage rights are a joke. From a recent interview in GQ:

I don’t think the issue’s about being against gay marriage. It’s about being for traditional marriage and articulating the reason that’s important. You have to have a basic family structure. There’s never been a civilization that has rewritten what marriage and family means and survive[d]. So there is a sense in which, you know, it’s one thing to say if people want to live a different way, that’s their business. But when you want to redefine what family means or what marriage means, then that’s an issue that should require some serious and significant debate in the public square. And if you look at states that have had it on the ballot—I know in our state it was a 70-percent-against issue. Most states are similar to that. [emphasis mine]

The fact that this kind of faulty logic actually works on some people is boggling. For one, even if what Huckabee says is true, the argument that because there is no evidence of something (like a society that has successfully redefined marriage or family), it is not viable, is an argument from ignorance: “there is no evidence for p; therefore, not p.” Even someone who got a C in introductory logic can spot the fallacy. Furthermore, he seems to be insinuating that there were societies who redefined marriage and family and did not survive, and if so, he’s committed a formal fallacy – affirming the consequent.

But even if the argument itself wasn’t fallacious, it relies on false premises. Marriage and family structure have changed dramatically over the course of human history. Marriage used to be a purely economic arrangement that benefited the family (which, by the way, didn’t resemble Huckabee’s “traditional” nuclear family). Marriage for romantic love is, in historic terms, an extremely young convention. And anti-miscegenation laws existed in this country until made unconstitutional in the 60s by the Supreme Court. Perhaps Huckabee thinks we should reinstate anti-miscegenation laws, or while we’re preserving “traditional” marriage, perhaps we should bring back dowries and limit the right to divorce. Oh wait, we know he at least would like to do the latter.

The fact is, marriage traditions have changed drastically over the last few centuries, as have families. The nuclear family so revered by the right is less than two centuries old, and still society hasn’t crumbled. And I think if you ask a Canadian, Belgian, or Netherlander if their societies are on the verge of toppling for permitting same sex marriages, you’d probably get a chuckle from most.

I just wish people like Huckabee would be honest and give the real reasons why they make these arguments: because they’re homophobes and they want to appeal to other homophobes who will focus on that issue and forget for a minute about the complete clusterfuck in Iraq or the other mishandlings the current administration and the Republican party are responsible for. I honestly would respect them more for not trying to paint over the hate and manipulation with bad logic and a shitty understanding of history.

I don’t know what’s more infuriating, the argument itself, or the fact that it gets thrown up like a smoke bomb every time an election is on the horizon and gone as soon as the votes are counted. When will Republicans stop playing the gay-fear card, and when will stupid redneck homophobes stop falling for it?

Yeah, I’ll be over here holding my breath.


Entry filed under: Uncategorized.

L O U D R O B O T I’ve been a bad, bad blogger.

2 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Ed  |  December 9, 2007 at 2:26 pm

    Republicans will stop courting the bigot vote as soon as they can win elections without it.

    Yeah, I’ll be over here holding my breath.

  • 2. Woeful  |  December 14, 2007 at 11:56 am

    I recently read over at reddit that Huckabee was quoted several years ago as saying that women should, “submit” to their husbands.

    “Huckabee” can you imagine a President Huckabee anyway? WTF?

    As an aside… There is no “proof” that God exists either, yet Huckabee seems to have plenty of faith that It does… It’s very convenient when selective beliefs work the way you want to push your own agenda!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

I also write for:

Latest Twitter Ramblings

Five Star Friday


December 2007
« Nov   Jan »

%d bloggers like this: